Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: 
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” 
– comparative evaluation of operation 
course and early results

Pełna treść

4/5/2004 vol. 106

Artykuł oryginalny

Ocena porównawcza przebiegu i wczesnych wyników po fakoemulsyfikacji zaćmy technikami divide and conquer oraz stop and chop

Data publikacji online: 2004/08/21

Plik artykułu

156_4-5_2004_MIERZEJEWSKI_OCENA.pdf

AMA

. Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: „divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” – comparative evaluation of operation course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2004;106(4):612-617.

APA

. (2004). Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: „divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” – comparative evaluation of operation course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 106(4), 612-617.

Chicago

. 2004. "Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: „divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” – comparative evaluation of operation course and early results". Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica 106 (4): 612-617.

Harvard

. (2004). Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: „divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” – comparative evaluation of operation course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 106(4), pp.612-617.

MLA

. "Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: „divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” – comparative evaluation of operation course and early results." Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, vol. 106, no. 4, 2004, pp. 612-617.

Vancouver

. Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: „divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop” – comparative evaluation of operation course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2004;106(4):612-617.

ZGŁASZANIE PRAC

Udostępnij

Zintergrowane z

Zasady redakcyjne

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications