. Cataract phacoemulsification techniques:
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop”
– comparative evaluation of operation
course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2004;106(4):612-617.
APA
. (2004). Cataract phacoemulsification techniques:
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop”
– comparative evaluation of operation
course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 106(4), 612-617.
Chicago
. 2004. "Cataract phacoemulsification techniques:
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop”
– comparative evaluation of operation
course and early results". Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica 106 (4): 612-617.
Harvard
. (2004). Cataract phacoemulsification techniques:
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop”
– comparative evaluation of operation
course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 106(4), pp.612-617.
MLA
. "Cataract phacoemulsification techniques:
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop”
– comparative evaluation of operation
course and early results." Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, vol. 106, no. 4, 2004, pp. 612-617.
Vancouver
. Cataract phacoemulsification techniques:
„divide and conquer” versus “stop and chop”
– comparative evaluation of operation
course and early results. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2004;106(4):612-617.
