|
Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Filmy
Artykuły w druku
O czasopiśmie
Suplementy
Rada naukowa
Recenzenci
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Opłaty publikacyjne
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
1/2026
vol. 128 Artykuł przeglądowy
Modern approaches to ILM peeling in macular hole and epiretinal membrane surgery: benefits, risks, and surgical innovations
Piotr P. Dudek
,
Sebastian Sirek
,
Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska
KLINIKA OCZNA 2026, 128, 1: 1-5
Data publikacji online: 2026/03/24
Plik artykułu:
- Modern.pdf
[0.60 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
1. Machemer R. Die chirurgische Entfernung von epiretinalen Makulamembranen (macular puckers) [The surgical removal of epiretinal macular membranes (macular puckers) (author’s transl)]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1978; 173: 36-42. 2.
Iovino C, Rosolia A, Damiano L, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy in inherited retinal diseases: a comprehensive review of the literature. Life 2023; 13: 1241. DOI: 10.3390/life13061241. 3.
Ghoraba H, Rittiphairoj T, Akhavanrezayat A, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8: CD015031. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.pub2. 4.
Pradhan D, Agarwal L, Joshi I, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery. Ger Med Sci 2022; 20: Doc07. DOI: 10.3205/000309. 5.
Sadeghi E, Colorado-Zavala MF, Almuhtaseb H, et al. Anatomical and functional changes after internal limiting membrane peeling. Surv Ophthalmol 2025; 70: 357-368. 6.
Lamas-Francis D, Bande-Rodríguez M, Blanco-Teijeiro MJ. Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 3586. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30060-w. 7.
Kanukollu VM, Agarwal P. Epiretinal membrane. In: StatPearls [serial online]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560703/. 8.
Gandorfer A, Rohleder M, Kampik A. Epiretinal pathology of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 902-909. 9.
Díaz-Valverde A, Wu L. To peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane in idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Retina 2018; 38: S5-S11. 10.
Da Mata AP, Burk SE, Riemann CD, et al. Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the retinal internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy surgery for macular hole repair. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1187-1192. 11.
Caramoy A, Kirchhof B, Hahn M, et al. Internal limiting membrane staining. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1282-1283.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.039. 12.
Remy M, Thaler S, Schumann RG, et al. An in vivo evaluation of Brilliant Blue G in animals and humans. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1142-1147. 13.
Carvounis PE, Heffez JL, Barkmeier AJ. Comparison of two techniques for epiretinal or internal limiting membrane peel. ClinicalTrials.gov [serial online] 2009 Apr 30 [cited 2024 Dec 10]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00892619 14.
Ferrara M, Rivera-Real A, Hillier RJ, et al. A randomised controlled trial evaluating internal limiting membrane peeling forceps in macular hole surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2023; 261: 1553-1562. 15.
Kuhn F, Mester V, Berta A. The tano diamond dusted membrane scraper, indications and contraindications. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 1998; 76: 754-759. 16.
Kimura H, Kuroda S, Nagata M. Triamcinolone acetonide-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 172-173. 17.
Kadonosono K, Itoh N, Uchio E, et al. Staining of internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1116-1118. 18.
Uemoto R, Yamamoto S, Takeuchi S. Changes in retinal pigment epithelium after indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting lamina peeling during macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 752-755. 19.
Engelbrecht NE, Freeman J, Sternberg P, et al. Retinal pigment epithelial changes after macular hole surgery with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 89-94. 20.
Walter S, Archambault S. No more forceps: a cutter-based approach to ILM peeling. Retina Today [serial online] 2023 May-Jun [cited 2024 Dec 10]; 16-18. Available from: https://retinatoday.com/articles/2023-may-june/no-more-forceps-a-cutter-based-approach-to-ilm-peeling. 21.
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Dulczewska-Cichecka K, et al. Temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus classic inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: a comparative study. Retina 2015; 35: 1844-1850. 22.
Rizzo S, Tartaro R, Barca F, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique for treatment of full-thickness macular holes: a comparative study in a large series of patients. Retina 2018; 38: S73-S78. 23.
Chen SN. Large semicircular inverted internal limiting membrane flap in the treatment of macular hole in high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 2337-2345. 24.
Wu TT, Kung YH. Comparison of anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery in patients with high myopia vs. non-high myopia: a case-control study using optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 250: 327-331. 25.
Patel SC, Loo RH, Thompson JT, Sjaarda RN. Macular hole surgery in high myopia. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 377-380. 26.
Aurora A, Seth A, Sanduja N. Cabbage leaf inverted flap ILM peeling for macular hole: a novel technique. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2017; 48: 830-832. 27.
Xu Q, Luan J. Internal limiting membrane flap technique in macular hole surgery. Int J Ophthalmol 2020; 13: 822-831. 28.
Guber J, Lang C, Valmaggia C. Internal limiting membrane flap techniques for the repair of large macular holes: a short-term follow-up of anatomical and functional outcomes. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2017; 234: 493-496. 29.
Velez-Montoya R, Ramirez-Estudillo JA, Sjoholm-Gomez de Liano C, et al. Inverted ILM flap, free ILM flap and conventional ILM peeling for large macular holes. Int J Retina Vitreous 2018; 4: 8. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-018-0111-5. 30.
Chen SN, Hsieh YT, Yang CM. Multiple free internal limiting membrane flap insertion in the treatment of macular hole-associated retinal detachment in high myopia. Ophthalmologica 2018; 240: 143-149. 31.
Abdul-Kadir MA, Lim LT. Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review. Int J Retina Vitreous 2021; 7: 75. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-021-00350-4. 32.
Chen SN, Yang CM. Double internal limiting membrane insertion for macular hole-associated retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017: 3236516. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3236516. 33.
Xie ZG, He QY, Zhu J, et al. A modified surgical technique of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling: continuous arc-shaped foldback peeling. J Ophthalmol 2020; 2020: 3568938. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3568938. 34.
Caporossi T, Carlà MM, Gambini G, et al. Spotlight on the internal limiting membrane technique for macular holes: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2022; 16: 1069-1084. 35.
Channa R, Scott AW. Managing macular holes. Retina Today [serial online] 2016 Jan-Feb [cited 2025 Apr 23]; 65-68. Available from: https://retinatoday.com/articles/2016-jan-feb/managing-macular-holes. 36.
Bagci F, Citirik M, Çelik Dülger S, Teke MY. Standard internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane abrasion technique for primary epiretinal membrane surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2022; 87: 0208. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0208. 37.
Haug SJ, McDonald HR. Clinical pearls for performing ILM peeling in vitreoretinal surgery. Retin Physician 2014; 11: 36-41. 38.
Spiteri Cornish K, Lois N, Scott N, et al. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus vitrectomy with no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013: CD009306. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009306.pub2. 39.
Asencio-Duran M, Manzano-Muñoz B, Vallejo-García JL, García-Martínez J. Complications of macular peeling. J Ophthalmol 2015; 2015: 467814. DOI: 10.1155/2015/467814. 40.
Gelman R, Stevenson W, Prospero Ponce C, et al. Retinal damage induced by internal limiting membrane removal. J Ophthalmol 2015; 2015: 939748. DOI: 10.1155/2015/939748. 41.
Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Gambicorti E, et al. Controversies over the role of internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy in macular hole surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 58-69. 42.
Haritoglou C, Ehrt O, Gass CA, et al. Paracentral scotomata: a new finding after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 231-233. 43.
Runkle AP, Srivastava SK, Yuan A, et al. Factors associated with development of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance in the pioneer intraoperative optical coherence tomography study. Retina 2018; 38: S103-S109. 44.
Musat O, Stefan C, Boariu AM, et al. Chromovitrectomy. Rom J Ophthalmol 2016; 60: 59-62.
|
 |
ENGLISH
