Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica
twitter
en POLSKI
eISSN: 2719-3209
ISSN: 0023-2157
Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica
Current issue Archive Videos Articles in press About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Visual outcomes one year after bilateral implantation of AT LARA 829MP extended depth of focus intraocular lenses

Małgorzata Piskała
1
,
Wojciech Lubiński
1
,
Karolina B. Podborączyńska-Jodko
1
,
Teresa Zwierko
2
,
Wojciech Jedziniak
2
,
Rafał Jędrzejczyk
3
,
Maciej Mularczyk
4

  1. 2nd Chair and Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
  2. Laboratory of Kinesiology, Functional and Structural Human Research Center, Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, University of Szczecin, Poland
  3. West Pomeranian Occupational Medicine Center, Szczecin, Poland
  4. Chair and Department of Basic and Clinical Anatomy, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
KLINIKA OCZNA 2025, 127, 3:
Online publish date: 2025/09/05
Article file
- KO-00530_EN.pdf  [0.65 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016; 387: 2145-2154.
2. Ukai Y, Okemoto H, Seki Y, et al. Quantitative assessment of photic phenomena in the presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0260406.
3. Kamiya K, Hayashi K, Shimizu K, et al. Multifocal intraocular lens explantation: a case series of 50 eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 215-220 e1.
4. de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12: CD003169.
5. Ribeiro FJ, Ferreira TB. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46: 694-699.
6. Li L, Zheng GY, Zhao YT, Li Y. [Long-term clinical observation of aspheric multifocal intraocular lens implantation]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2017; 53: 599-609 [Chinese].
7. Ganesh S, Brar S, Rp N, Rathod D. Clinical Outcomes, Contrast Sensitivity, Reading Performance and Patient Satisfaction Following Bilateral Implantation of AT LARA 829MP EDoF IOLs. Clin Ophthalmol 2021; 15: 4247-4257.
8. Schallhorn SC, Schallhorn CS, Teenan D, et al. One-Year Outcomes in a Large Series of Patients Following Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg 2021; 37: 380-388.
9. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 227-233.
10. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed „Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-148.
11. Regulation of the Minister of Health of August 29, 2019 on medical examinations of persons applying for driving licenses and drivers. Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1659.
12. Kretz FTA, Müller M, Gerl M, et al. Binocular function to increase visual outcome in patients implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. BMC Ophthalmol 2015; 15: 110.
13. Xu J, Zheng T, Lu Y. Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia. J Ophthalmol 2020; 2020: 9283021.
14. Gawęcki M, Prądzyńska N, Kiciński K, et al. Patient reported outcomes after implementation of an enhanced depth of focus intraocular lens with low postoperative myopia. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res 2023, 3: 86-92.
15. Reinhard T, Maier P, Böhringer D, et al. Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 259: 431-442.
16. Kanclerz P, Toto F, Grzybowski A, Alio JL. Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2020; 9: 194-202.
17. Rementería-Capelo LA, Contreras I, Morán A, et al. Visual Performance of Eyes with Residual Refractive Errors after Implantation of an Extended Vision Intraocular Lens. J Ophthalmol 2023; 2023: 7701390.
18. Liu J, Dong Y, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 198.
19. Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, et al. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses. J Refract Surg 2019; 35: 434-440.
20. Cochener B, Boutillier G, Lamard M, Auberger-Zagnoli C. A Comparative Evaluation of a New Generation of Diffractive Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. J Refract Surg 2018; 34: 507-514.
21. Mencucci R, Favuzza E, Caporossi O, et al. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256: 1913-1922.
22. Escandón-García S, Ribeiro FJ, McAlinden C, et al. Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction. J Ophthalmol 2018; 2018: 6165493.
23. Monaco G, Gari M, Di Censo F, et al. Visual performance after bilateral implantation of 2 new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: Trifocal versus extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43: 737-747.
24. Ruiz-Mesa R, Abengózar-Vela A, Aramburu A, Ruiz-Santos M. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol 2017; 27: 460-465.
25. Ruiz-Mesa R, Abengózar-Vela A, Ruiz-Santos M. A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol 2018; 28: 182-187.
26. Alba-Bueno F, Vega F, Millán MS. Halos y lentes intraoculares multifocales: origen e interpretación [Halos and multifocal intraocular lenses: origin and interpretation]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2014; 89: 397-404.
27. de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 12: CD003169.
28. de Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39: 268-278.
29. Kohnen T, Titke C, Böhm M. Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation to Treat Visual Demands in Various Distances Following Lens Removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 161: 71-77.e1.
30. Law EM, Aggarwal RK, Kasaby H. Clinical outcomes with a new trifocal intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014; 24: 501-508.
31. Guarro M, Sararols L, Londoño GJ, et al. Visual disturbances produced after the implantation of 3 EDOF intraocular lenses vs 1 monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022; 48: 1354-1359.
32. Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Yan W, et al. Visualization of Ray Propagation through Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 2667.
33. de Medeiros AL, Jones Saraiva F, Iguma CI, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13: 1657-1663.
34. Lubiński W, Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Kirkiewicz M, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol 2020; 40: 2553-2562.
35. Moshirfar M, Ellis J, Beesley D, et al. Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2021; 15: 3051-3063.
36. Webers VSC, Bauer NJC, Saelens IEY, et al. Comparison of the intermediate distance of a trifocal IOL with an extended depth-of-focus IOL: results of a prospective randomized trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46: 193-203.
37. Peterka RJ. Sensory integration for human balance control, in: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Day BL, Lord SR (eds.). Elsevier, Cambridge, MA 2018; 27-42.
38. Grace Gaerlan M, Alpert PT, Cross C, et al. Postural balance in young adults: the role of visual, vestibular and somatosensory systems. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2012; 24: 375-381.
39. Hwang S, Agada P, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ. Dynamic reweighting of three modalities for sensor fusion. PLoS One 2014; 9: e88132.
40. Stopyra W. Current ophthalmological norms for drivers – how does Poland compare with other countries? Klin Oczna 2020; 122: 147-151.
41. Auffarth GU, Hunold W, Breitenbach S, et al. Langzeitergebnisse für Kontrastsehvermögen und Blendungsempfindlichkeit bei Patienten mit diffraktiven Multifokallinsen [Long-term results of contrast perception and glare sensitivity in patients with diffraction multifocal lenses]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1993; 203: 336-340 [German].
42. Yan MK, Kumar H, Kerr N, et al. Transnational review of visual standards for driving: How Australia compares with the rest of the world. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 47: 847-863.
43. Kobal N, Hawlina M. Comparison of visual requirements and regulations for obtaining a driving license in different European countries and some open questions on their adequacy. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16: 927712.
44. Boadi-Kusi SB, Austin E, Abu SL, et al. Disability glare and nighttime driving performance among commercial drivers in Ghana. J Occup Health 2021; 63: e12279.
45. Johnson CA, Wilkinson ME. Vision and driving: the United States. J Neuroophthalmol 2010; 30: 170-176.
46. Murthy GJ, Deshmukh AV, Mallidi AR, et al. Renewal of driving license in India and glaucoma: A study of widespread practice and its lacunae. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019; 67: 240-246.
47. Bron A, Visvanathan A, Thelen U, et al. International vision requirements for driver licensing and disability pensions: using a milestone approach in characterization of progressive eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 1361-1369.
48. Owsley C, Swain T, Liu R, et al. Association of Photopic and Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity in older drivers with risk of motor vehicle collision using naturalistic driving data. BMC Ophthalmol 2020; 20: 47.
49. von Hebenstreit B. Visual acuity and traffic accident. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1984; 185: 86-90.
50. Gray R, Regan D. Glare susceptibility test results correlate with temporal safety margin when executing turns across approaching vehicles in simulated low-sun conditions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 440-450.
51. Lee JH, Moon SY, Chung HS, et al. Clinical outcomes of a monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function compared with an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022; 48: 61-66.
52. Jeon YJ, Yoon Y, Kim TI, Koh K. Comparison Between an Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00) and a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens With Enhanced Intermediate Vision (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00). Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2021; 10: 542-547.
53. Sabur H, Unsal U. Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A casecontrol study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2023; 33: 262-268.
54. Baur ID, Khoramnia R, Weindler J, et al. Clinical Outcomes of a New Hybrid Monofocal IOL With Extended Depth of Focus. J Refract Surg 2021; 37: 601-608.
55. Bova A, Vita S. Clinical and Aberrometric Evaluation of a New Monofocal IOL with Intermediate Vision Improvement. J Ophthalmol 2022; 2022: 4119698.
56. Stodulka P, Slovak M. Visual Performance of a Polynomial Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens. Open J Ophthalmol 2021; 11: 214-228.
57. Huh J, Eom Y, Yang SK, et al. A comparison of clinical outcomes and optical performance between monofocal and new monofocal with enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses: a case-control study. BMC Ophthalmol 2021; 21: 365.
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.